The county assessor’s office
has been warning residents to be wary of companies promising to save them tax
dollars by reassessing their property values — something the county does
for free.
As the Nov. 31 deadline to
file property reassessment appeals nears, residents should be cautious of
letters from companies promising to save homeowners property tax dollars, if
they pay up to $200, said Santa Barbara County Clerk-Recorder & Assessor
Joe Holland.
Some of these letters have
due dates, prompting unassuming recipients to promptly send in fees to avoid
costly penalty charges.
“All these companies are
doing is calling us to review the property value,” Holland explained. “(It’s)
something the homeowner can do for free.”
So-called “decline in value
requests” allow property owners to ask county assessors to review the value of
their properties for tax purposes, if they believe the market value has
dropped; and with recent declines in the housing market, thousands of
homeowners have done so.
Holland said while companies
that provide services his office does for free aren’t breaking any laws, they
are committing what he called “scams” by taking advantage of unsuspecting
homeowners.
“Our own people bring in
these notices,” Holland said. “My chief appraiser got a notice, and it said the
value of his house was $350,000 and that he should request a review. He knows
it was $800,000. Many of these services are misleading.”
Holland said that many of
the letters he’s seen look like government documents.
“By not clearly showing that
they are not a government agency or are approved by one is a violation of
California law,” he said.
Buellton resident Young Lee
said he has seen four of these mailings over the past year. “A lot of them have
come from Orange County,” he said. “They look like clerk letters and they
charge from $100 to $180.”
Young said he tosses the
letters in the trash can.
“These companies are
exploiting vulnerable people,” he said. “It’s wrong.”
Santa Barbara County is not
the only jurisdiction warning its residents of these scams, some of which have
landed people in court.
Last month, a Simi Valley
man was charged with 20 felony counts for running an outfit that sent out
thousands of mailers to people, charging $200 for property tax reassessment and
reassessment appeal services that were almost never performed. The company
reportedly warned homeowners they faced late fees and would be ineligible for
future reassessment services if payments were late.
But are all companies that
help homeowners lower their assessed values running a scam?
David Brown, CEO and
mortgage planner for Residential Mortgage of Solvang, who has an ownership in a
company that provides such services, said no, and accused Holland of
exaggerating the problem.
Speaking to a group of
realtors in Santa Ynez, Holland allegedly said that every company that provides
reassessment services was a scam, Brown said, adding that Holland has since
retracted his remark.
Brown said casting all
companies that provide reassessment services as scam-artists is akin to someone
calling the IRS and telling them that every certified public accountant is
dishonest and provides no value to customers because some people can do their
own taxes.
“What Mr. Holland should
have said was, ‘Be careful and look at the people who are providing you with
that information,’” Brown said. “There are scammers out there, but there are
also companies that will do the footwork to ensure that a property owner is
getting the lowest assessed value possible.”
Holland told the Journal
that legitimate companies exist, and that he meant to focus on the unscrupulous
companies that have been cropping up in the wake of the housing bust.
Brown said because most
county assessor’s offices are understaffed and overworked, they don’t always
look as closely as they could at some properties.
When legitimate companies
negotiate with the county — even attending assessment appeal hearings on
the property owner’s behalf — it forces them to take a closer look at the
property owner’s tax reduction, he said.
But Brown went further,
claiming that the county has no incentive to reduce property taxes.
“I don’t think they’re being
as aggressive as they could be given the real estate conditions,” he said. “It’s
like the fox guarding the hen house.”
“I got an assessment of one
of my properties in Lompoc,” he said. “The assessment they did was likely 30
percent above the actual market value. So it was courtesy type of reduction to
avoid getting an appeal.”
Holland responded: “I’m an
elected official and my job is to use the fair market or base year property
value.”
This past year, the county
lowered 20,000 assessments, with 95 percent completed without the property
owner asking for a review, Holland pointed out.
“If a property owner
disagrees, they have the right to appeal,” he said. “And if they still do not
think the value reduction is reasonable, they can always file an appeal with
the Clerk of the Board. At that time they can search for sales on the website
(sbcassessor.com/MapLocator.aspx) or hire a real estate professional to
represent them in the appeals process.”
Property owners looking to
have their properties reassessed through private companies are advised to not
do business with companies that misrepresent themselves as a government agency
or a government-endorsed company; to use credit cards to pay for services; and
to go with companies that offer money-back guarantees.
jfoster@syvjournal.com