“We whittled the
budget down to not use reserves, which is a goal every year but this year was
particularly hard,” Finance Director Dana Waite said while giving the budget
presentation.
The general fund for the City of Solvang has been
balanced with a projected total $6,426,741 in revenue covering the projected
$6,426,741 in expenses. The revenue from the general fund property tax has even
been adjusted in anticipation of the state raid of $160,000.
The state is facing a budget shortfall of $21 billion. It
is proposing to close up to $8 billion of that shortfall, in part, by borrowing
property tax revenue from local governments and taking sales tax revenues from
local governments.
“And just when we thought we were safe,” Waite said while
showing the audience a slide with the anticipated property tax loss. It showed
a cartoon figure running away with a bag of money across the state of
California, while the council and audience members chuckled.
Although the city was able to balance its budget, some
projects that requested funding had to be put on the back burner, such as new
curtains for the Veterans Hall and employee pay increases.
Funding for the library, however, was included in the
2009-10 budget, and multiple members of Friends of the
Library spoke of their gratitude to the council.
The treasurer of Friends of the Library, Carolyn
Lawrence, presented the council members with book bags designed by school
children as a thank you and “No quid pro quo intended.”
“We strive to support the library and provide essential
services to this community,” she said. “We serve the children and everyone in
this community.”
Also during the public comment period, Willi Campbell praised the council for continuing to fund
many projects, even on a minimalistic budget.
“I came for the budget,” she said, “and I came to say
thank you.”
The council also congratulated itself and the staff on
balancing the budget, citing Waite and City Manager Brad Vidro
as the “reason we are in such great financial shape,” as Mayor Jim Richardson
put it. The budget will be brought back to the council in a future meeting for
a vote to accept it.
In other council news:
After two hours of presentations and discussion, the city
council unanimously voted to not have Richardson sign a letter opposing the
proposed mandatory spay/neuter ordinance, to the delight of pet lovers in the
audience.
The Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors is
currently considering a new mandatory spay/neuter ordinance for the county in
the next few months.
The supervisors put together a Spay/Neuter Ordinance Task
Force to research the subject more thoroughly and present recommendations to
the board in the fall.
Elements from the so-called Calgary model may be used.
That system mandates dog licensing and uses money from licensing fees for
animal services. The Calgary model is self sufficient, though whether or not it
could work in Santa Barbara County remains to be researched.
If the county adopts a plan similar to the Calgary model,
it may have to hire additional staff members. The task force, however, is still
conducting its study and no formal response to the ordinance has yet been
crafted.
During the last meeting of the mayors and city managers,
the group decided to draft a letter opposing the ordinance, saying following a
Calgary model would add unneeded expenses during the financial crisis. Once the
letter was drafted, however, Richardson did not like the language and made his
signature an agenda item for the June 8 council meeting.
Richardson requested the item to be discussed first, as
there were about 20 people in the audience who specifically wanted to hear
about or speak to the topic.
Richardson gave a slide show presentation about the Calgary model,
saying he did, in fact like it and believed it would be successful in the
county.
Multiple pet owners from the public gave their two cents
on the matter, agreeing that there is a rising problem with animal
overpopulation in the county, and whether they liked the Calgary model or
thought mandated spay/neutering laws would be better, everyone also agreed no
action should be taken until the task force is done with its study.
“I urge you not to sign the letter, let the task force
come out with its final recommendation,” said Volunteers for Inter-Valley
Animals member Dianne Howe during the public comment.
Councilmember Joannie Jamieson
made a motion to not sign the letter, which was seconded by councilmember Ed Skytt.
“I agree with everybody speaking tonight. … I feel if a
letter were to go out right now, it would definitely be putting the cart before
the horse,” Skytt said.
The motion passed unanimously.
Animal activist Hazel Mortensen said she was “delighted”
by the council’s decision, and while she hopes a Calgary-type plan will
eventually be adopted, she said she wants steps to be taken to make sure the
county’s animal problem never gets to a level similar to Los Angeles County.
“We need to face up to things,” she said. “If this keeps
up where we have no control on the breeding, then our shelters could end up
like that, where Chihuahuas end up with pit bulls (in the same cage) and you
know who’s going to win that fight.”
Reach Lauren Crecelius at
lcrecelius@syvjournal.com.